While I’m at it: my fundamental problem with most pre-97 shows is that the first sets are uninteresting. I’m not saying bad, mind you. It’s just that I like shows better if there’s jams in both sets. Or at the very least an interesting segue, cover, extra good but otherwise normal version, etc. Be honest with yourself. You don’t like 2/20/93 and 5/7/94 for the first sets. They’re very bottom heavy shows, with all the good shit reserved for the second set. Again, I’m not saying those first sets are bad. But you have more free time than me if you bother to listen to them everytime you want to hear the segue madness of 2/20/93 or the Tweezerfest.
Also while I’m at it: pre-93 shows are only interesting to me a historical curio. Sure, they’re tighter than hell and they play a lot of songs then that they didn’t afterward, but that’s not enough for me to bother collecting/paying for pre-93 shows.
All of these arguments are built on the fact that the primary thing that drew me to Phish, and continues to, is their jamming. I would honestly take a long, meaty Piper or Ghost over a well played, perfect Fluffhead any day of the week. So let’s just clear that up right now. That’s where I’m coming from.
With alllll that said, the first set of this show is boring and only worth a handful of listens. It reminds me of basically any fall '95 first set in that I’ll listen to it at the most twice through. Like 12/14/95, everyone loves this show for the second set. Also like that show, this one delivers in spades in the second set. The second set, the entire thing, is a peak experience, the kind that reminds you why you listen to so much Phish in the first place.



