You just proved my point: every team schedules weak teams. It’s just the way it is. If you consider that we play three shitty teams, while someone like Boise or Oregon plays probably 5 or 6, well, that kinda proves my point as well. Teams like those are literally only challenged a few times a year. SEC teams are challenged every time they play in conference, so why in the hell would you want to schedule three ridiculously good out of conference teams on top of that? That’s just shooting yourself in the foot.
Also, forgive me for saying so, but this Michigan State schedule is certainly no tougher than Auburn’s:
09/04/10 vs. Western Michigan - W, 38-14
09/11/10 vs. Florida Atlantic - W, 30-17
09/18/10 vs. Notre Dame - W, 34-31 (OT)
09/25/10 vs. Northern Colorado - W, 45-7
10/02/10 vs. Wisconsin - W, 34-24
10/09/10 at Michigan - W, 34-17
10/16/10 vs. Illinois (Homecoming) - W, 26-6
10/23/10 at Northwestern - W, 35-27
10/30/10 at Iowa - L, 37-6
11/06/10 vs. Minnesota - W, 31-8
11/20/10 vs. Purdue - W, 35-31
11/27/10 at Penn State - W, 28-22
01/01/11 vs. Alabama
I mean, Western MI, FL Atlantic, Northern CO, Illinois, Minnesota, Purdue, none of those are very good teams (no offense to anyone who may be fans of those teams). Minnesota is 3-9, Western Michigan is 7-6 (and they play a weak schedule), Florida Atlantic is 4-8, and so on. Honestly, to me that looks like a weaker schedule than Auburn’s. Those teams that we played that had shitty records this year are still perennially strong football teams, regardless of their record. Even if Georgia was 6-6 this year, you still can never assume you will beat them. They are a great football program. And so is almost every other team in the SEC, other than Vandy and UK. So, even though I’m biased, the numbers tell the story.




I am a happy man. Never thought I would see this day. Unreal!