I talk about that twist all the time. I absolutely love it.
Anyway, back to the topic of this thread. I’ve been thinking about this lately, and I think both the Miami and Vegas runs may have played equal parts in causing Trey to come to his decision in May 2004. Vegas, because it OBVIOUSLY highlighted Trey’s drug problem, and just overall showed how much being the leader of such a large organization was wearing on him.
Miami is so much different than Vegas though. The quality of the shows and the energy of the band was so much better. I saw this run, and it was the best week of my life. Also, band members talked about how the Miami shows were some of their best ever. However, Trey, in an interview that was recently posted here somewhere, talked a lot about how post-hiatus (although I don’t think this is entirely true–they did play a lot of new songs, but they did rely on older tunes to “make” the show), they seemed to be playing the old songs more, and becoming stagnant.
In Miami, they played like four new songs, and most of them were slow tunes (anything but me, Friday).
I think Trey, looking back on this run, may have realized that his band could become a nostalgia act. They had a great time, and put on some great shows, but they relied mostly on older material.
I don’t know if this was just used as another excuse to cover up the real reason for the breakup (the drugs, bigness of it all), or if it really did play a large part in the decision of “ending” it. If that’s the case, when phish does come back, I would expect even less “songy” setlists, and more jamming and new songs. I bet less than half of the songs they play would be from before “Farmhouse”.
Anyway, I’m getting pretty speculative here…I’ll end this rant.