Whatever dude. To call them THE band of our generation is perfectly logical. Yeah, we all like Phish better, and Phish are more versitile, and Phish have done more weird out-there shit, and Phish jam out their songs, and Phish have really widely varied setlists (sometimes)… but that doesn’t change the fact that if you select ten random people off the street ANYWHERE (except for Vermont) nine of them probably won’t have heard of Phish and only one won’t have heard of Pearl Jam.
As a band, Pearl Jam has immense importance and lasting impact.
If they or their music DIDN’T matter, they wouldn’t have survived DROPPING OUT of everything commercial and mainstream after the whole ticketmaster battle. If it DIDN’T matter, they wouldn’t have survived having nine people trampled at that show in Denmark in 2000. They quit after that, you know.
Sure, bitch about how PJ’s setlists aren’t as varied as Phish. Well, VERY FEW bands have such varied setlists. SFW??? PJ’s setlists are more varied than most other rock bands. Don’t think they do enough one-off random covers? Refer to this: http://www.pearljam.com/songs/songs.php
Honestly, the only band I can think of whose career rivals that of Pearl Jam and could even possibly compete for THE band of our generation is U2. And I don’t care if you like them either.