So I was talking to my friend last night about who, if anyone, would be right & able to fill the shoes of the role of Joker in the next movie.
I’ve read interviews before Heath died that said the Joker was going to be in the third. So…
We came up with Johnny Depp.
He could totally do it.
The voice would be no problem and his looks would match up as well.
I said Crispin Glover, but then we decided he would be a good Riddler instead.
Anyway, what do you think?
Your life must really suck to have to look at everything through politics-colored glasses. Seriously, that’s not even an insult…you probably can’t help it. I feel sorry for you, bud. You’re never EVER going to be happy with the world.
And I agree on Johnny Depp doing a good Joker since he seems to do well with any quirky role like that. I thought he was great as Jack Sparrow and The Duke. Still, I’d imagine if they did have him, it’d be in a very small role…I wonder if they’d not even cast a new actor out of respect for what ledger did with the role. And supposedly Gary Oldman has mentioned the Riddler in a number of interviews so that seems like a good guess. They could do something with a really dark and twisted Riddler.
Stevo
I don’t think they’ll recast the Joker now that Ledger is dead. I have, however, heard of plans for Johnny Depp to play the Riddler in the next film. Which would be bad ass.
Of course, stupid hollywood gossip columnists are talking about how it would be a great idea to have Angelina Jolie play Catwoman. What a fucking stupid idea. Angelina Jolie sucks, first of all, and could never follow up a performance like Ledger’s successfully. And secondly, more importantly, the Catwoman movie was one of the biggest flops of all time, right up there with Days of Thunder. If you can’t sell tickets by putting Halle Berry in a Catwoman costume, then maybe the character just doesn’t have that much going on.
I think it would be quite disastrous for this new series of Batman movies to follow the ones that the Burton franchise did.
Catwoman in the film after the Joker is a mistake, IMO.
^Well it was that Joel Shumacher who ruined the first series. Once those Neon guys started popping up in Gotham’s underworld and the Batsuit had nipples, it was over.
Very true.
Who said I’m not happy?, very happy in fact. God, beautiful Fiance, Maui, 45 Phish shows over 9 years, many friends for over 20 years. Yep, nice and happy over here. However, my happiness doesn’t blind me to the realities of the world however horrible they can be at times.
^Well, you’re seeing propaganda that isn’t actually there…that would depress the crap out of me. Like I said before, you can’t help it but it just must suck sometimes. As great as your life is as you say, if you weren’t constantly deluding yourself, it could be better. And yeah, I know, I know…I’m the one who’s actually deluded and blind to what’s REALLY going on…I know…
Anyway…they need to leave Catwoman alone for now. Her character was never that great to begin with and while Michelle Pfieffer was okay in the 2nd movie, they don’t need to redo it. Putting in the Riddler sounds like a good idea. Maybe it’s me but I don’t like films with multiple villains…it just ends up as a big clusterfuck kind of like Spider Man 3 which was a disaster. They did it fairly well with Two-Face and Joker but I wouldn’t push your luck…I’d say one villain is usually more than enough to carry a movie.
Stevo
i’m not so sure about that, i def got some social commentary vibes from the movie, all the terrorist stuff and how they now make batman movies to be more realistic instead of comic book"y" to sell to a wider audience and throw their ideals/views at an audience that is there to escape (for the most part) everyday life into a realm of fantasy, i mean for christ’s sake, “Wall-E” was one big propagandeic social commentary movie
Seriously, what the fuck was Wall-E?
I still dont see the difference between ‘terrorist’ and ‘super-villian’… they both reign shit over whatever their goal is so… aren’t they fucking synonomous?
as for comic book genre of movie… all depends on whos directing, acting, etc… I see the Burton movies and the current run both entertaining in their own right, but i like the realistic stuff more because… yea technology kicks ass nowadays…
anyways GR is right about judging the movies especially since Dark Knight just came out and the future, but to say “Jack is just a better actor than Heath Ledger”… well Heath hasnt necessarily been around as long as Jacky boy right? so imo its kinda like judging the movies if your judging the actors…
but to the negativity around here lately, damn keep it fuckin breezy up in this beotch.
i think there’s a lot of propaganda in movies these days because movies always (for the most part) reflect the time they are made in. we live in fucked times.
and seriously, if you scratch the political surface, these times are even more fucked than we are led to believe.
but anyway, yeah. that’s why all the propaganda and shit.
bunnies! (re-restoring the breeze)
bunnies?
Pick your poison
I could totally picture that happening.
Johnny Depp=Twisted Riddler=Pure Unadulterated Tits.
and i’ll have nothing but that.
Yes, that’s why we go to movies so we escape all that silly stuff. When I watch movies, politics and crap are the LAST thing on my mind.
Half the time I wouldn’t even want to watch a heavy political movie. All it does is tell me how fucked up everything is which I already know. Great, everything’s fucked up. There’s nothing I can do about it so why worry about it? But that’s me…some folks really enjoy it so to each their own. I’m not one to judge anyone.
Speaking of bunnies…here’s some non-propaganda footage of a classic bunny scene…Man, this movie rules.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCI18qAoKq4
And the more I think about it, the more I realize they really can’t bring back Two-Face. The whole point about Batman saying that he did the murders at the end was to keep Dent as a hero and not let the Joker “win.” If they bring him back then that whole message is completely ruined. Seems a bit silly to me.
But seriously, just because a guy blows stuff up and they show a corrupt system doesn’t mean it’s some political statement. They had terrorists in movies before 9/11 and had corrupt politicians in movies before any of the current era as well. Sometimes these things just make for an interesting plot and aren’t there to tell you anything.
Stevo
Boo. Just posted all about what I thought about the film and then lost my post.
I liked it. Too melodramatic, and a smidge overrated. I tend to agree with Nicholson = Ledger.
Ledger was good. Didn’t blow my mind like I kind of expected him to.
I left the theater feeling like I didn’t really care for it, but had some great conversation about it afterwards… reflecting back, I realized how much I actually liked the film.
I have this bad habit of hitting the Escape key at the worst times which seems to instantly delete anything you typed in these boxes with basically no way to get it back. I get SO pissed at that. Why the heck would they stick that function to the keyboard!!!?
I think the length didn’t help it. Combined with the 10 hours of previews before the movie it took quite a while to get through. I started to get a little weary near the end but it picked up with the final scenes so I forgot all about it being too long.
Stevo
I didn’t like how the Joker was left (literally) hanging so that we could all focus, for the remainder of the film, on the less interesting Harvey Two Face character.
And as I said, I didn’t like the melodrama of it all …
Outside of those factors, it was more than you could really hope for in a film about … freaking Batman. It’s Batman, and that’s important to remember. Same kind of thinking that keeps me from getting too upset about the dumb parts of Revenge of the Sith … I mean, how critical can you rightfully be of this kinda pop art? It’s like giving a food critique of the dollar menu version of the McChicken.
^Well Sith had really great actION, but really bad actING.
^ I think it had better acting than Ep 1 or 2. And a way better story.