^I kind of took it both ways. I like the guy even though his personality sucks. I think he’s a brilliant coach.
I saw his crossing the field early was an act of concession of that 1 second. Problem is that it signaled for all these people to pour onto the field and it really wasn’t up to him to concede. They actually had to run the clock out. I don’t see it necessarily classless, as much as assumption he was wrong about.
He made lots of wrong assumptions that day.
I think that whole 18 and 0 thing made the Pats vulnerable, and I have to blame the coaching staff for it, because they certainly had the talent on the field. There’s a tendancy, when you win all your games, to be less innovative because your current formulas seem to work like gangbusters.
Trouble is, using those formulas continually because they work leaves you vulnerable to those who figure out your patterns of behavior, and therefore exploit the weaknesses of those patterns.
I have to praise the brilliance of the Giants defensive coordinators because they must have studied that offensive line and backfield until they understood every nuance of each player. I mean, if they watched the center for instance, and realized that 63% of the time he held his right elbow up at a 45 degree angle when approached from the left, that’s a behavior pattern that could be exploited.
If the Pats weren’t doing the same thing to tell their linemen to be aware of their patterns, to be aware of how they can be exploited, these guys will be beat eventually, and in many different combinations.
In every playoff game the Giants were in, they were tuned up and understood their opponents. It wasn’t just luck, and not just superhuman play by average players. The whole team was doing their job, especially the coaches and spotters. Maybe they bought some new software tool that analyzes the other teams better than anything before. It seemed like something was different about the team, and I have to give the credit to the coaching staff as well as any other part of the team.